[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
Re: F(000)
- To: Multiple recipients of list <coredmg@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: F(000)
- From: "George M. Sheldrick" <gsheldr@shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 19:30:19 GMT
Howard Flack wrote: > > > > > The .fcf reflection data file written by SHELX-97 includes F(000) (as > > the integer number of electrons) and certain other items > > Is the F(000) you include the one that corresponds to the "observed" > structure amplitudes or to the model "calculated" ones? Or do you assume > they are always equal? Or rather how do you arrange things for the > Fourier synthesis if the F(000) or number of electrons in the model is > not the same as the number you know or expect in the unit cell? It seems > to me that two F(000)'s are needed but you only explicitly mention one of > them. > > -- The F(000) output by SHELXL is always the 'calculated' one based on the given unit-cell contents. We have never been in the fortunate position of being able to measure F(000). George
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
- Prev by Date: Re: Permitting new physical units?
- Next by Date: Re: Permitting new physical units?
- Prev by thread: Re: F(000)
- Next by thread: Neutron diffraction experiments
- Index(es):