[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
Re: Permitting new physical units?
- To: Multiple recipients of list <coredmg@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: Permitting new physical units?
- From: John Westbrook <jwest@ndbdev.RUTGERS.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 14:49:06 GMT
Greetings, I wonder if there may be a simpler way to achieve a solution to the problem that keeps all of the information required to construct a data item name within the given definition. In the example that Syd has presented, the new DDL attribute _units_construct can be expanded into the set of allowed strings which define the permitted units for a the given data item. Although it is not stated in the new DDL definition, I assume that any one of these strings can then be used as a suffix to the root data item name producing a complete data item name including the specification of units. The same result could be obtained by permitting the item units DDL attribute to assume multiple values (be of type 'list') and then extending the rule for forming data item names to include the possible appending of one of units attributes to the data item name. The units_default attribute would indicate the default case, and the units which are used in the event no units suffix is added to the data item name. Since it has been a design goal of DDL1.x to localise, as much as possible, the attributes of a definition within the definition data block, I think that the above solution is more DDL1 friendly if unit information is to be added only in the form of suffixes to data item names. If on the other hand, you would want to be more creative in the construction of data item names, where unit information might be embedded anywhere within the data item name, then you would certainly have to move in the direction of the regex syntax that Syd has proposed. If this is the case, then I think that the _units_construct DDL definition should be modified to define the construction for entire data item name, rather than the just the portion dealing with units. Regards, John -- ****************************************************************** John Westbrook Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Department of Chemistry 610 Taylor Road Piscataway, NJ 08854-8087 e-mail: jwest@ndb.rutgers.edu Ph: (732) 445-4290 Fax: (732) 445-4320 ******************************************************************
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
- Prev by Date: Re: Permitting new physical units?
- Next by Date: Re: F(000)
- Prev by thread: Re: Permitting new physical units?
- Next by thread: Re: Permitting new physical units?
- Index(es):