[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fwd: FW: Supreme Court Rules on Tasini vs. New York Times]

• To: Multiple recipients of list <epc-l@iucr.org>
• Subject: [Fwd: FW: Supreme Court Rules on Tasini vs. New York Times]
• From: Howard Flack <Howard.Flack@cryst.unige.ch>
• Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:02:59 +0100 (BST)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--Boundary_(ID_hVdxIVRzlDt6YwSwHcLHqQ)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit


-- 
Howard Flack        http://www.unige.ch/crystal/ahdf/Howard.Flack.html
Laboratoire de Cristallographie               Phone: +41 22 702 62 49
24 quai Ernest-Ansermet             mailto:Howard.Flack@cryst.unige.ch
CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland                   Fax: +41 22 702 61 08

--Boundary_(ID_hVdxIVRzlDt6YwSwHcLHqQ)
Content-type: message/rfc822

Return-path: <owner-icsti-l@DTIC.MIL>
Received: from gate.unige.ch ([129.194.8.77])
 by mbx.unige.ch (PMDF V6.0-24 #38753)
 with ESMTP id <0GFJ00AS1P3005@mbx.unige.ch> for flack@mail.cryst.unige.ch
 (ORCPT howard.flack@CRYST.UNIGE.CH); Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:13:48 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from DIRECTORY-DAEMON.gate.unige.ch by gate.unige.ch
 (PMDF V6.0-24 #38753) id <0GFJ00D01P2Z2G@gate.unige.ch> for
 flack@mail.cryst.unige.ch (ORCPT howard.flack@CRYST.UNIGE.CH); Tue,
 26 Jun 2001 18:13:47 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mails.dtic.mil (mails.dtic.mil [131.84.1.19])
 by gate.unige.ch (PMDF V6.0-24 #38753)
 with ESMTP id <0GFJ00BL9P2VXK@gate.unige.ch> for howard.flack@CRYST.UNIGE.CH;
 Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:13:47 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from list.dtic.mil (list.dtic.mil [131.84.105.11])
	by mails.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/990419cac) with ESMTP id MAA18886; Tue,
 26 Jun 2001 12:13:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from list (list.dtic.mil [172.16.105.11])
	by list.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/1.0) with ESMTP id MAA18795; Tue,
 26 Jun 2001 12:12:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DTIC.MIL by DTIC.MIL (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d)
 with spool id 27185 for ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:12:31 -0400
Received: from mails.dtic.mil (mails.dtic.mil [131.84.1.19])
 by list.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/1.0) with ESMTP id KAA24644 for
 <icsti-l@list.dtic.mil>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:21:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sys723.dtic.mil (sys723e.dtic.mil [131.84.1.2])
 by mails.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/990419cac) with ESMTP id KAA21092 for
 <icsti-l@DTIC.MIL>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:21:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sys723.dtic.mil (root@localhost) by sys723.dtic.mil with ESMTP
 id f5QEJiN02158 for <icsti-l@DTIC.MIL>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:19:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dticexch.dtic.mil (dticexch.dtic.mil [131.84.6.66])
 by sys723.dtic.mil with ESMTP id f5QEJiJ02154 for <icsti-l@dtic.mil>; Tue,
 26 Jun 2001 10:19:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by dticexch.dtic.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
 id <NT3G2YD4>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:21:44 -0400
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:21:43 -0400
From: "Molholm, Kurt" <kmolholm@DTIC.MIL>
Subject: FW: Supreme Court Rules on Tasini vs. New York Times
Sender: ICSTI-L list <ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL>
Approved-by: crandall@DTIC.MIL
To: ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL
Reply-to: ICSTI-L list <ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL>
Message-id: <AB6780112626D211A6920008C7567CB2071F9198@dticexch.dtic.mil>
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Comments: cc: Directors <Directors@DTIC.MIL>

FYI,

Kurt

-----Original Message-----
From: Gail Hodge [mailto:Gailhodge@AOL.COM]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:35 PM
To: CENDI-PA@DTIC.MIL
Subject: FYI:Supreme Court Rules on Tasini vs. New York Times


In a ruling that is likely to have a major impact on authors, publishers,
and
secondary database producers, the Supreme Court has ruled on the case of
Tasini vs. New York Times.
http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/06/25/scotus.copyright.ap/index.html

>From the CNN article:

 "The court ruled 7-2 that compilation in an electronic
database is different from other kinds of archival or library storage of
material that once appeared in print. That means that copyright laws require
big media companies such as The New York Times to get free-lancers'
permission before posting their work online."

The decision itself is likely to be available online soon.  While the
article
signals out big media companies and free lancers, this is expected to have
an
impact on author/publisher relations in general.  It should be noted that
many publishers have already gone to so called "Martian" permissions where
they ask for copyright transfer everywhere, anytime, and in any media.  It
isn't clear what the impact might be on permissions done under the old
regime
before permission and copyright transfer agreements included electronic
versions.  Some anticipate that rather than try to get permissions from
authors of old material, publishers may just remove that material from
electronic databases.

Gail

--Boundary_(ID_hVdxIVRzlDt6YwSwHcLHqQ)--

Reply to: [list | sender only]

• Prev by Date: Re: Problems with IUCr listserv? Re: Subscription approval request
• Next by Date: Re: Publication policy/archiving policy
• Prev by thread: Re: Publication policy/archiving policy
• Next by thread: [Fwd: FW: Supreme Court Rules on Tasini vs. New York Times]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread