[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
Re: Core CIF revisions
- To: Multiple recipients of list <coredmg@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: Core CIF revisions
- From: "I. David Brown" <idbrown@mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:39:27 +0100 (BST)
Thank you all for your comments on the proposed revisions for version 2.3 of the Core CIF dictionary. It is great to have so much feedback, even if it would have been more welcome earlier. It is now too late to deal with some of the questions raised in time for inclusion in version 2.3 and these items will have to be held over for version 2.4 (which I hope will follow soon). The spate of activity in the coreDMG list has prompted some replies to other private emails I sent out requesting information. These will also assist in preparing for version 2.4. Howard Flack has made some pertinant comments, and below I explain how I intend to deal with these, given the short deadlines. ATOM_TYPE_SCAT As mentioned in yesterday's email, these items are being withdrawn so that they can be carefully thought through for list number 8. This will be combined with the review of multi-radiation and multi-diffraction-experiment changes. Howard's comments will be fully taken into account when I prepare the dictionary copy for this revision. REFINE_LS_EXTINCTION_METHOD This item has also been withdrawn and left for later discussion. While I sympathize with Howard's feeling that this may all be junk, these corrections are routinely applied and the reader needs to know what was done. It would be wrong to postpone a review of the reporting of extinction (which is included in most archival CIFs) until someone comes up with a better method. We could wait a long time and in the meantime even more junk would accumulate in the archive. EXPTL_CRYSTAL_DENSITY_MEAS_GT etc. These items were requested in order to transcribe information in legacy papers and databases. We should discourage its use in new work. I will modify the definition to make this clear. EXPTL_CRYSTAL_RECRYSTALLIZATION_METHOD I will expand the definition along the lines suggested by Howard. CHEMICAL_PROPERTIES_PHYSICAL and _*_BIOLOGICAL Kathleen Foreman has sent a number of examples that I will include in the revisions to be posted after July 4. Thank you, Kathleen. SPACE_GROUP Brian's corrections to the space group items were mostly related to mistakes I made in extracting items from the symCIF dictionary. The symCIF dictionary is written in DDL2 and includes more items than are proposed for inclusion in the coreCIF dictionary. While transcription from DDL2 to DDL1 is relatively straightforward, extracting only some of the names left a number of references to items that are in the symCIF dictionary, but that will not be in the Core dictionary. Most of Brian's comments deal with removing such references which I overlooked. Once again thanks for your comments which will be incorporated in the cumulative list of revisions to be posted on July 4. David ***************************************************** Dr.I.David Brown, Professor Emeritus Brockhouse Institute for Materials Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Tel: 1-(905)-525-9140 ext 24710 Fax: 1-(905)-521-2773 idbrown@mcmaster.ca *****************************************************
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
- Prev by Date: Re: CIF core revision list 6 _exptl_crystal_recrystallization_method
- Next by Date: Approval of CIF core changes for 2.3
- Prev by thread: Re: Approval of CIF core changes for 2.3
- Next by thread: Re: CIF core revision list 6 _exptl_crystal_recrystallization_method
- Index(es):