[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
Comments on list #5
- To: Multiple recipients of list <coredmg@iucr.org>
- Subject: Comments on list #5
- From: "Haltiwanger, Curt" <CHaltiwanger@bruker-axs.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:24:25 GMT
CoreDEF Colleagues, Some of my comments may be completely off of the wall as I am new to this business. In any case I hope they are helpful. Comments - _exptl_crystal_density_meas_gt or lt Is this really a measured density or is it an observation related to density. Like Syd, the lt and gt made no sense to me until I had read David's explanation. This suggests that we need more information Presumably the scientist would put how less than 1.0 was determined by an entry in _exptl_crystal_density_meas_method _exptl_crystal_density_meas_method would benefit from additional example - perhaps "sample floats in water" or "sample sinks in ethanol" The definition should include some examples Davids comment make a good start on the example _exptl_crystal_appearance_colour_primary etc >From a practical point of view, what do I do with my old database entries that have red orange as a single entry. Do I have to separate them to get a good cif? Personally I prefer yellow green to yellowish green If we have lists for colors, do we want to have a similar list for _exptl_crystal_description. Has that entry been dealt with already? Would _exptl_crystal_habit be useful? _exptl_crystal_recrystallzation_method Will this be an enumerated list like color? Seems like it would be useful to have a list. Sublimation, evaporation, cooling, serendipity, spontaneous, vapor diffusion, gel diffusion, ..... Then there should be a _exptl_crystal_recrystallzation_method_details section for more information like temperature and solvents. I think the Syd's suggestions for the extinction are fine. In the symmetry entries can we please keep Int_Tables IT sounds like my Information Technologies department. If we can have an entry as long as _exptl_crystal_appearance_colour_primary then we can certainly have _space_group_Int_Tables_number. As a novice, what happens to current symmetry entries. I assume they translate into the new cif and that cif reads will know that _symmetry_equiv_pos_as_xyz is the same as _space_group_symop_operation_xyz. Why that name doesn't symop imply operation. Why are we replacing _symmetry_equiv_pos_as_xyz which seems to be an accurate desciption of "1/2-x,1/2+y,1/2-z" for example. Curt Haltiwanger =============================================== R. Curtis 'Curt' Haltiwanger Senior Application Scientist Bruker-AXS 5465 East Cheryl Parkway Madison WI 53711-5373 Phone: (608)276-3073 FAX: (608)276-3006 Mobile: (608)347-8694 E-mail: CHaltiwanger@bruker-axs.com WWW: Bruker-AXS.com ===============================================
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
- Prev by Date: CIF core dictionary revisions List #5
- Next by Date: Re: Comments on list #5
- Prev by thread: CIF core revision list 6
- Next by thread: Re: Comments on list #5
- Index(es):