[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
Re: proposal for valence items
- To: Multiple recipients of list <coredmg@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: proposal for valence items
- From: "I. David Brown" <idbrown@mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:58:28 GMT
Howard, There is a way of getting your defintion of chirality into CIF along the following lines: data__chemical_chirality _name _chemical_chirality _category chemical _type char _definition ; A flag indicating that the crystal contains a chiral molecule. Chirality is defined as the geometric property of a rigid object (or spatial arrangement of points or atoms) of being nonsuperposable on its mirror image; such an object has no symmetry operations of the second kind (a mirror plane, m; a centre of inversion, -1; a roto-inversion axis, -N). If the object is superposable on its mirror image, the object is described as being achiral. ; loop _enumeration -enumeration_detail yes 'a chiral molecule is present' no 'no chiral molecule is present' This item could appear in a CIF though there may never be any need to introduce it, but in any case the definition can be referred to from other items in the dictionary (or elsewhere) and so perform the function you are looking for. I don't know what other items you want to define, so I can't comment on whether the same trick would work for them. Is it worth thinking again about adding these definitions? David ***************************************************** Dr.I.David Brown, Professor Emeritus Brockhouse Institute for Materials Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Tel: 1-(905)-525-9140 ext 24710 Fax: 1-(905)-521-2773 idbrown@mcmaster.ca *****************************************************
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
- Prev by Date: Re: proposal for valence items
- Next by Date: Re: proposal for valence items
- Prev by thread: Re: proposal for valence items
- Next by thread: Re: proposal for valence items
- Index(es):