[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
Re: proposal for AS & AC related items
- To: Multiple recipients of list <coredmg@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: proposal for AS & AC related items
- From: Howard Flack <Howard.Flack@cryst.unige.ch>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:50:46 +0100 (BST)
Dear David, > If I interpret your last message correctly, the only change you > are proposing is the replacement of the definition of > _chemical_absolute_configuration (which currently occupies half a > column) > with the four-line reference to your paper. That is perfectly correct. > You do not seem to have > made > any changes to the enumeration list and definitions. That is also perfectly correct. > If this is right, > then the only thing we need to consider is the change to _definition, > i.e. > all the rest of the information in this dictionary datablock remains > unchanged. That is also perfectly correct. > Am I missing something? > Nothing. > If a consensus develops on twinning in a reasonable > length > of time, Tricky. Best wishes, H. -- Howard Flack http://www.unige.ch/crystal/ahdf/Howard.Flack.html Laboratoire de Cristallographie Phone: 41 (22) 702 62 49 24 quai Ernest-Ansermet mailto:Howard.Flack@cryst.unige.ch CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland Fax: 41 (22) 702 61 08
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
- Prev by Date: Re: proposal for AS & AC related items
- Next by Date: proposal for valence items
- Prev by thread: Re: proposal for AS & AC related items
- Next by thread: Re: proposal for twin terms
- Index(es):