[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
Re: Neutron diffraction experiments
- To: Multiple recipients of list <coredmg@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: Neutron diffraction experiments
- From: syd@crystal.uwa.edu.au (Sydney R Hall)
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 13:09:27 GMT
No, Howard you are not allowed two tries... especially when your second one violates the basic syntax! These sorts of approaches were suggested and discarded eight years ago. I promise to have a go at _refine_diff_density_* this weekend... I'm not allowed to have any fun during the week. I have noted both Brian and David's suggestions and will see if there is not a sensible and simple approach to a more flexible definition. There may not be, in which case we are stuck with a new name for each probe type. Cheers, Syd.
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
- Prev by Date: Re: Neutron diffraction experiments
- Next by Date: Permitting new physical units?
- Prev by thread: Re: Neutron diffraction experiments
- Next by thread: Modus operandi of COMCIFS Core Dictionary Maintenance Group
- Index(es):