[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Standard X- name prefix?
- To: "Discussion list of the IUCr Committee for the Maintenance of the CIFStandard (COMCIFS)" <comcifs@iucr.org>
- Subject: Standard X- name prefix?
- From: Joe Krahn <krahn@niehs.nih.gov>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:46:40 -0400
I added my own prefix to the prefix registry for general-purpose local data types. Perhaps it would be better to generalize the idea similar to mail/HTTP and other internet headers which reserve the "X-" prefix to mean a non-standard name. This could be reserved for local developmental work, or temporary additions not defined in the current dictionary. Is this an acceptable idea? Is anyone already using a data name starting with "X-"? (I wouldn't be too surprised if there is a "X-Ray..." name. Joe
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Standard X- name prefix? (Brian McMahon)
- Prev by Date: ESD notation
- Next by Date: Re: Standard X- name prefix?
- Prev by thread: Posting DDLm on the IUCr CIF web site
- Next by thread: Re: Standard X- name prefix?
- Index(es):