[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: Phase ID Discussion Paper 7
- To: A Working Group of the IUCr Commission on Crystallographic Nomenclature <phase-identifiers@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: Phase ID Discussion Paper 7
- From: David Brown <idbrown@mcmaster.ca>
- Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 10:30:00 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <KGEBKGFDGDEKIICFOIJLCEGGEAAA.sca@mind.net>
- References: <KGEBKGFDGDEKIICFOIJLCEGGEAAA.sca@mind.net>
Dear Sidney, Thank you for your thoughts on the phase identifier - I will go through these and incorporate them as appropriate in the next draft I am preparing. I have taken your advice and checked with Steve Stein about my interpretation of the IChI symbol and he has provided some clarification. Your attached pdf did not open, but I don't think I need it. We are mostly concerned with a computer readable representation of the symbol and the symbol is simple enough that it does not need any special formatting for a printed version. Best wishes David S. C. Abrahams wrote: >Dear David: > >Many thanks for your Discussion Paper #7 on phase ID and all the >thought, with which I am in general agreement, that has clearly gone >into it. Specific suggestions for possible incorporation into the draft >Report to be considered by the Working Group follow: > >1. The IUCr phase nomenclature divides fields by a vertical bar (|), >not a solidus (/) . Since the former symbol is found on all keyboards, >I propose retaining it in the IChI symbol. > >2. In §2.1, having provided an IChI example you note “The following >is an explanation of the above IChI as far as I can figure it out.” Since >our Report should certainly incorporate an authoritative explanation of >all IChI abbreviations to be used, why not run that explanation by the >IChI group so that possible misunderstandings, including case sensitivity, >may be eliminated. > >3. In §3.2 under COMPOSITION, an example of a formula unit in which > ‘one or more of the multipliers is non-integral, so that the size of the >formula unit is indeterminate and only the relative multipliers are >meaningful’ >should be given for clarity. Similarly for cases in which ‘non-integral >multipliers are encountered’, the ‘tolerance factor to allow for >experimental >uncertainties’ should be defined and a clarifying example given. > Under PH, I suggest we add each of the crystalline states for which a >specific nomenclature is given in the second IUCr phase nomenclature >Report, namely magnetic, incommensurate, composition-changed >morphotropic, polytype and transient-structural in addition to >quasicrystalline phases. Incidentally, the abbreviation ‘amp’ for >amorphous is not very intuitive; perhaps a five-letter symbol would be >clearer, e.g. > > liqud liquid > amphs amorphous > solid solid of unknown form > cryst crystal > liqcr liquid crystal > magcr magnetic crystal > inccr incommensurate crystal > comcr composition-changed morphotropic crystal > polcr polytype crystal > trncr transient-structural crystal > quasi quasicrystal > >4. Responding to your invitation that we suggest ‘the best’ way in which >the IChI phase identifier could be incorporated into the IUCr phase >transition >nomenclature, I would argue that a union of the two symbolic systems has >greater value than the sum of the two used separately, at least when first >introduced. As suggested by the examples below, the united symbol indicates >to the potential user a means of searching the literature for a given >inorganic >or organic crystalline phase for all cases in which that phase can be >appropriately identified. > >You also ask for some additional examples under §3.3. Combining the two >requests, an example taken from each of the two IUCr Phase Nomenclature >Reports is presented. A pair of vertical bars (all bars are in bold type >below, >for emphasis) is used to separate the IChI from the IUCr symbol, as follows: > >K2TeBr6|PH:xtl|SG:14:ae4||III|<400K|P21/n(14)|Z=2|Ferroelastic|12 variants > >(CH3)3NCH2COO·CaCl2·2H2O|PH:xtl(incom)|SG:33:a28||XVI|<50K, 4GPa,<180K| >Pn21a(33)|Z=4|Ferroelectric|Nonmodulated ferroelectric polarization along b > >A pdf file of the above material, with full formatting, is attached. In case >the >file fails to reach a member because of our Web-based reply system, I would >be glad to send a copy directly on request. > >Best wishes > >Sidney >------------------------------------------ >Prof. S. C. Abrahams >Physics Department >Southern Oregon University >Ashland, OR 97520 > >Fax: (541) 552-6415 Tel. (541) 482-7942 >Email: sca@mind.net >------------------------------------------ > >--- >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.642 / Virus Database: 410 - Release Date: 3/24/2004 > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >phase-identifiers mailing list >phase-identifiers@iucr.org >http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/phase-identifiers > _______________________________________________ phase-identifiers mailing list phase-identifiers@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/phase-identifiers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- RE: Phase ID Discussion Paper 7 (S. C. Abrahams)
- Prev by Date: RE: Phase ID Discussion Paper 7
- Next by Date: Phase ID draft report
- Prev by thread: RE: Phase ID Discussion Paper 7
- Next by thread: #6 Pierre Villars
- Index(es):