[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
RE: *[SPAM]* Draft Phase Identifier Report version 1
- To: "A Working Group of the IUCr Commission on Crystallographic Nomenclature" <phase-identifiers@iucr.org>
- Subject: RE: *[SPAM]* Draft Phase Identifier Report version 1
- From: "S. C. Abrahams" <sca@mind.net>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:49:28 -0800
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <3FF9BA8A.3090905@mcmaster.ca>
Dear David >I have no idea if a summary is being prepared. Steve Stein at NIST is >the organizer of the meeting and he is the one who likely would put up a >report. I will pass the word along if I hear about such a report. I would be happy to encourage Steve to prepare an early summary, even if it were only as cursary as that of the July 2002 meeting, but would not wish to do so without consulting you first. Many thanks for the other points in my message you have now addressed. Sidney -----Original Message----- From: phase-identifiers-bounces@iucr.org [mailto:phase-identifiers-bounces@iucr.org]On Behalf Of David Brown Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 11:27 AM To: A Working Group of the IUCr Commission on Crystallographic Nomenclature Subject: Re: *[SPAM]* Draft Phase Identifier Report version 1 Dear Sydney, I am planning to prepare a new version of the draft report on chemical items for CIF in which I will incorporate all the comments received, but one or two of your questions can be answered now for the benefit of the group. >I regret the earlier >item was not noticed subsequently among the excessive quantity of spam now >received daily. > I have the same problem and I would recommend that people give an eye-catching subject in their email that will instantly identify the message as not spam - something with the letters CIF in it for example. > However, members may well wish to see further details >of the results >agreed upon during the IChI workshop at NIST in November 2003. Are these >expected to >become available soon? > I have no idea if a summary is being prepared. Steve Stein at NIST is the organizer of the meeting and he is the one who likely would put up a report. I will pass the word along if I hear about such a report. >In reading your first draft, however, it is striking that no mention is made of the >proposed method(s) of implementing such a system, possibly because they seem obvious >to the specialist. > The reason for not discussing these detail is that they would need to be worked out in conjunction with the IChI group if the crystallographic identifier is to be incorporated into IChI. I first want to establish the principles, then discuss their implementation with the IChI group. I sent a copy of this report to Steve and have had a very favourable response. I will address the other points in your email in the next draft of the report. David *************************************** I.David Brown, Professor Emeritus of Physics Brockhouse Institute for Materials Research McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario Canada L8S 4M1 Tel: +905 525 9140 ext 24710 Fax: +905 521 2773 email: idbrown@mcmaster.ca *************************************** _______________________________________________ phase-identifiers mailing list phase-identifiers@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/phase-identifiers --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.558 / Virus Database: 350 - Release Date: 1/2/2004 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.558 / Virus Database: 350 - Release Date: 1/2/2004 _______________________________________________ phase-identifiers mailing list phase-identifiers@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/phase-identifiers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- Re: *[SPAM]* Draft Phase Identifier Report version 1 (David Brown)
- Prev by Date: Re: *[SPAM]* Draft Phase Identifier Report version 1
- Next by Date: Phase ID Discussion Paper 7
- Prev by thread: Re: *[SPAM]* Draft Phase Identifier Report version 1
- Next by thread: Discussion #6
- Index(es):