[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
RE: phase identifiers
- To: Multiple recipients of list <phase-identifiers@iucr.org>
- Subject: RE: phase identifiers
- From: "S. C. Abrahams" <sca@mind.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:00:27 +0100 (BST)
Dear David: Thanks for your discussion paper number 5 with its interesting suggestion for the identity resolution of organic isomers. Preliminary examination of several trial isomers confirms that the proposed string of four (in preference to five) numerical variables indeed performs the required resolution quite handily. I doubt, however, if there is much to be gained by dropping the zero designation for the number of carbon atoms without H (in the zeroth through third position), since the space saved is minor whereas their presence helps recall the resolution scheme for the user/reader. Incidentally, use of the word "spectrum" for a 'string or sequence of numbers' is likely to be misleading since a spectrum is generally associated with a wavelength or energy. I, too, am unfamiliar with organic molecules containing several optically active sites. Does each such isomer have a different optical acivity? If so, that could provide the necessary information for identity resolution. The next five keys seem fine, but I am unfamiliar with the Pauling file. The structure types in the Struktur Berichte indeed have many familiar and well-used names but is hardly encyclopedic. The names assigned by the International Mineralogical Association(?) to natural minerals are very useful and widely used by non-mineralogists. They should, however, be used for their synthetic analogues only if suitably modified. For example, synthetic materials with the stillwellite-type structure form a new family of ferroelectrics; they, as is the case for other mineral analogs,are generally referred to as stillwellite-types or as stillwellite-type structures. Use of "_reduced_crystallographic_cell" with prescribed tolerances should indeed be useful for identifying identical materials. In view of all other information in the total key, the prescribed tolerances could probably be relatively relaxed. I look forward to the comments of our fellow members. With all best wishes Sidney ------------------------------------------ Prof. S. C. Abrahams Physics Department Southern Oregon University Ashland, OR 97520 Fax: (541) 552-6415 Tel. (541) 482-7942 Email: sca@mind.net ------------------------------------------
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: phase identifiers
- Next by Date: Michael Berndt is dead (fwd)
- Prev by thread: phase identifiers
- Next by thread: Phase Identifiers 2 (fwd)
- Index(es):