[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
contribution to working group
- To: sca@mind.net, faber@icdd.com, vicky.karen@nist.gov, bm@iucr.org, motherwell@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, idbrown@mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca
- Subject: contribution to working group
- From: Jean-Claude Toledano <jean-claude.toledano@polytechnique.fr>
- Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:49:27 +0200 (METDST)
- Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:58:27 +0100
- Resent-From: bm@iucr.org
- Resent-Message-Id: <200204090858.g398wRl22769@agate.iucr.ac.uk>
- Resent-To: phase-identifiers-archive@iucr.org
Comments (9th april 2002) on the various questions raised by David Brown 7.1) Yes the composition should be part of the identifier. This is the first characteristics by which anyone will refer to the considered phase. As for variable compositions (e.g. solid solutions ?) , I do not know if they have a CAS number. They generally have a formula characterized by x,y,… indices instead of numerical ones. 7.2) To be discussed later. The external identifier is not clear to me yet. 7.3) ? 7.4) Clearly the Pearson symbol is adequate to distinguish phases which differ in their translational properties (through the centering and the number of atoms in the unit cell) and also phases which have point groups belonging to different crystal systems (except for the trigonal and hexagonal systems which are considered identical in certain cases). Part of the difficulties pointed out by David Brown for the SiO2 phases (maximal and minimal symmetries within a crystal system on the one hand leading to different symbols for the same structure, and, on the other hand, same symbol for different structures) arise from the non-specification of the point-group. One could think of replacing the indication of the crystal system by a number associated to one of the 32 point groups, and in keeping the two other features (centering type and number of atoms). This may solve part of the difficulties of transitions between crystalline phases, but will leave unsolved the question of labelling the phases which depart more or less from the crystalline state (which are considered in the second of the papers on nomenclature) : incommensurate phases, magnetic phases, quasicrystalline phases , etc… Before submitting proposals, I would like to know if the working group wishes to consider these systems. PS I used initially the recommended address (phase-transitions@iucr.org) but the message came back. Jean-Claude Toledano Professeur Laboratoire des Solides Irradies et Departement de Physique Ecole Polytechnique 91128-Palaiseau-cedex tel.(33)1 69 33 37 39 jean-claude.toledano@polytechnique.fr
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: Re: Discussion list for phase identifiers
- Next by Date: contribution to working group (fwd)
- Prev by thread: contribution to working group (fwd)
- Next by thread: RE: contribution to working group
- Index(es):