[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [Fwd: Inorganica Chimica Acta (2006) 359: 383-387]
- To: "IUCr Committee on Electronic Publishing, Dissemination and Storage of Information" <epc@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: Inorganica Chimica Acta (2006) 359: 383-387]
- From: Howard Flack <crystal@flack.ch>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:32:25 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20061215093652.GA10107@emerald.iucr.org>
- References: <4582504C.2080401@Flack.ch><20061215093652.GA10107@emerald.iucr.org>
PS: I've just had a brilliant idea. May be I should write a complaining letter to the IUCr's Newsletterpointing out English-speaking authors' responsibilities in international collaborations. If this offender does not read his own papers, there is just an outside chance that he reads the IUCr's Newsletter. > I cheerfully claim that much of my original draft was clever, > witty, urbane, profound and subtle. The above PS is in the same category. Perhaps Nicola would have written: "Flack thinks **** is a lazy sod." _______________________________________________ Epc mailing list Epc@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/epc
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- [Fwd: Inorganica Chimica Acta (2006) 359: 383-387] (Howard Flack)
- Re: [Fwd: Inorganica Chimica Acta (2006) 359: 383-387] (Brian McMahon)
- Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: Inorganica Chimica Acta (2006) 359: 383-387]
- Next by Date: [Fwd: A new choice for authors]
- Prev by thread: Re: [Fwd: Inorganica Chimica Acta (2006) 359: 383-387]
- Next by thread: Economist Technology Review
- Index(es):