[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
[Fwd: LISNews.com | Wikipedia -- can open source be a good source?]
- To: epc@iucr.org, hfuess@tu-darmstadt.de, na@iucr.org
- Subject: [Fwd: LISNews.com | Wikipedia -- can open source be a good source?]
- From: Howard Flack <crystal@flack.ch>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:03:04 +0200
Very interesting in relation to authoritative works like International Tables for Crystallography. H.
- To: ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL
- Subject: LISNews.com | Wikipedia -- can open source be a good source?
- From: Barry Mahon <barry.mahon@IOL.IE>
- Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 09:49:28 +0100
- Approved-by: crandall@DTIC.MIL
- Reply-to: ICSTI-L list <ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL>
Hi, At this URL: <URL: http://www.lisnews.com/article.pl?sid=04/08/26/1337250 > There is a discussion on the potential risks associated with Wikipedia, a user written and edited Encyclopedia which is very popular with students as a quick information source. The questions that are discussed include the 'value' of user written entries, the accuracy of citations, etc., all the base issues which have also been discussed in the Open Source debate. Bye, Barry
_______________________________________________ Epc mailing list Epc@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/epc
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: News items
- Next by Date: ICSTI: news items
- Prev by thread: Fwd: Proceedings of Stockholm Meeting - European Science Open Forum;session on science publishing
- Next by thread: News items
- Index(es):