[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
[Fwd: Elsevier supports insitutional archiving]
- To: epc@iucr.org
- Subject: [Fwd: Elsevier supports insitutional archiving]
- From: Howard Flack <crystal@flack.ch>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 11:28:42 +0200
- To: ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL
- Subject: Elsevier supports insitutional archiving
- From: Barry Mahon <barry.mahon@IOL.IE>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 08:51:23 +0100
- Approved-by: rbishop@DTIC.MIL
- Reply-to: ICSTI-L list <ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL>
From AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM: Stevan Harnad "Elsevier has just gone from being a Romeo "Pale-Green" publisher to a full Romeo Green publisher: Authors have the publisher's official green light to self-archive both their pre-refereeing preprints and their refereed postprints. Elsevier has thereby demonstrated that -- whatever its pricing policy may be -- it is a publisher that has heeded the need and the expressed desire of the research community for Open Access (OA) and its benefits to research productivity and progress. http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/21.html There will be the predictable cavils from the pedants and those who have never understood the real meaning and nature of OA: "It's only the final refereed draft, not the publisher's PDF," "It does not include republishing rights," "Elsevier is still not an OA publisher." I, for one, am prepared to stoutly defend Elsevier on all these counts, and to say that one could not have asked for more, and that the full benefits of OA require not one bit more -- from the publisher. For now it's down to you, Dear Researchers! Elsevier (and History) is hereafter fully within its rights to say: "If Open Access is truly as important to researchers as they claim it is -- indeed as 30,000+ signatories to the PLoS Open Letter attested that it was http://www.publiclibraryofscience.org/cgi-bin/plosSign.pl -- then if researchers are not now ready to *provide* that Open Access, even when given the publisher's official green light to do so, then there is every reason to doubt that they mean (or even know) what they are saying when they clamour for Open Access." Bye, Barry
_______________________________________________ Epc mailing list Epc@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/epc
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: Open Source Publishing Directions]
- Next by Date: [Fwd: Fwd: Re: Elsevier Gives Authors Green Light for Open AccessSelf-Archiving]
- Prev by thread: Re: [Fwd: Breaking news for publishing authors]
- Next by thread: [Fwd: Open Source Publishing Directions]
- Index(es):