[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
[Fwd: Correction to list item]
- To: Multiple recipients of list <epc-l@iucr.org>
- Subject: [Fwd: Correction to list item]
- From: Howard Flack <Howard.Flack@cryst.unige.ch>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 14:19:40 GMT
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_Zz6biCmUyhoUjVR8DusEYw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -- Howard Flack http://www.unige.ch/crystal/ahdf/Howard.Flack.html Laboratoire de Cristallographie Phone: 41 (22) 702 62 49 24 quai Ernest-Ansermet mailto:Howard.Flack@cryst.unige.ch CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland Fax: 41 (22) 702 61 08 --Boundary_(ID_Zz6biCmUyhoUjVR8DusEYw) Content-type: message/rfc822 Return-path: <owner-icsti-l@DTIC.MIL> Received: from gate.unige.ch ([129.194.8.77]) by mbx.unige.ch (PMDF V6.0-24 #44959) with ESMTP id <0G6U00NWIKZN33@mbx.unige.ch> for flack@mail.cryst.unige.ch (ORCPT howard.flack@CRYST.UNIGE.CH); Mon, 08 Jan 2001 15:16:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from DIRECTORY-DAEMON.gate.unige.ch by gate.unige.ch (PMDF V6.0-24 #44959) id <0G6U00I01KZN8X@gate.unige.ch> for flack@mail.cryst.unige.ch (ORCPT howard.flack@CRYST.UNIGE.CH); Mon, 08 Jan 2001 15:16:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from mails.dtic.mil (mails.dtic.mil [131.84.1.19]) by gate.unige.ch (PMDF V6.0-24 #44959) with ESMTP id <0G6U00GX2KZM5C@gate.unige.ch> for howard.flack@CRYST.UNIGE.CH; Mon, 08 Jan 2001 15:16:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from list.dtic.mil (list.dtic.mil [131.84.105.11]) by mails.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/990419cac) with ESMTP id JAA27184; Mon, 08 Jan 2001 09:16:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from list (list.dtic.mil [172.16.105.11]) by list.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/1.0) with ESMTP id JAA28581; Mon, 08 Jan 2001 09:15:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from DTIC.MIL by DTIC.MIL (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 3461 for ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL; Mon, 08 Jan 2001 09:15:35 -0500 Received: from mails.dtic.mil (mails.dtic.mil [131.84.1.19]) by list.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/1.0) with ESMTP id QAA23719 for <icsti-l@list.dtic.mil>; Sat, 06 Jan 2001 16:14:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from kang.tinet.ie (mail1.tinet.ie [159.134.237.19]) by mails.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/990419cac) with ESMTP id QAA12221 for <icsti-l@dtic.mil>; Sat, 06 Jan 2001 16:14:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from p10.as1.bantry1.eircom.net ([159.134.209.10] helo=eircom.net) by kang.tinet.ie with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #23) id 14F0fB-0000BP-00 for icsti-l@dtic.mil; Sat, 06 Jan 2001 21:14:09 +0000 Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 20:33:28 +0100 From: Barry Mahon <mahons1@EIRCOM.NET> Subject: Correction to list item Sender: ICSTI-L list <ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL> Approved-by: mbrautig@DTIC.MIL To: ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL Reply-to: ICSTI-L list <ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL> Message-id: <3A577308.885CCB37@eircom.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD47 (Win98; I) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 I have received the following correction to the item posted by Stephanie on my behalf last week. > From: "Gelsinger, Patrick P" <patrick.p.gelsinger@intel.com> > Subject: Re: IBM and Intel push copy protection ... (Gilmore, RISKS-21.17) > > [Received via Dave Farber, whom Patrick had requested to post a correction.] > > Content protection technology misinformation generates negative web-press > coverage: > > An article on *The Register* website "Stealth plan puts copy protection into > every hard drive" contains false information that the 4C's (Intel, IBM, MEI, > Toshiba) Content Protection for Recordable Media (CPRM) is to be applied to > all PC hard drives. It is misinterpreting a specification for use of CPRM > with the Compact Flash media format (which supports either semiconductor > flash memory or IBM microdrives) probably because Compact Flash uses the > same command protocol interface as standard PC harddrives. The technology > is neither intended nor licensed for use with PC harddrives and is optional > even for the supported media types (flash memory and microdrives). John > Gilmore, a noted privacy and consumer advocate, has picked up the article > and further propagated the erroneous information and mentioned Intel > "IBM&Intel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives". I have alerted > public relations at Intel and are disseminating accurate information within > Intel and among our industry contacts. > Bye, Barry --Boundary_(ID_Zz6biCmUyhoUjVR8DusEYw)--
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: RE: Ingenta/ICSTI Study
- Next by Date: [Fwd: FYI: FIZ Karlsruhe to Launch Free Sci Tech Service Across the
- Prev by thread: [Fwd: FYI: FIZ Karlsruhe to Launch Free Sci Tech Service Across the
- Next by thread: RE: Ingenta/ICSTI Study
- Index(es):