[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
[Fwd: 'News for Nov 28th']
- To: Multiple recipients of list <epc-l@iucr.org>
- Subject: [Fwd: 'News for Nov 28th']
- From: Howard Flack <Howard.Flack@cryst.unige.ch>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 17:23:20 GMT
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_QeyN2GwkObIb5+hFpYO/dA) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT -- Howard Flack http://www.unige.ch/crystal/ahdf/Howard.Flack.html Laboratoire de Cristallographie Phone: 41 (22) 702 62 49 24 quai Ernest-Ansermet mailto:Howard.Flack@cryst.unige.ch CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland Fax: 41 (22) 702 61 08 --Boundary_(ID_QeyN2GwkObIb5+hFpYO/dA) Content-type: message/rfc822 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Return-path: <owner-icsti-l@DTIC.MIL> Received: from gate.unige.ch ([129.194.8.77]) by sunny.unige.ch (PMDF V6.0-24 #44959) with ESMTP id <0G4Q002A4UCXH7@sunny.unige.ch> for flack@sunny.unige.ch (ORCPT howard.flack@CRYST.UNIGE.CH); Tue, 28 Nov 2000 17:41:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from DIRECTORY-DAEMON.gate.unige.ch by gate.unige.ch (PMDF V6.0-24 #44959) id <0G4Q00801UCXXS@gate.unige.ch> for flack@sunny.unige.ch (ORCPT howard.flack@CRYST.UNIGE.CH); Tue, 28 Nov 2000 17:41:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from mails.dtic.mil (mails.dtic.mil [131.84.1.19]) by gate.unige.ch (PMDF V6.0-24 #44959) with ESMTP id <0G4Q00849UCWSF@gate.unige.ch> for howard.flack@CRYST.UNIGE.CH; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 17:41:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from list.dtic.mil (list.dtic.mil [131.84.105.11]) by mails.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/990419cac) with ESMTP id LAA14615; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:40:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from list (list.dtic.mil [172.16.105.11]) by list.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/1.0) with ESMTP id LAA09037; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:40:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from DTIC.MIL by DTIC.MIL (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 14743 for ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:40:29 -0500 Received: from mails.dtic.mil (mails.dtic.mil [131.84.1.19]) by list.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/1.0) with ESMTP id LAA04244 for <icsti-l@list.dtic.mil>; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:01:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from s1.smtp.oleane.net (s1.smtp.oleane.net [195.25.12.3]) by mails.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/990419cac) with ESMTP id LAA10429 for <icsti-l@dtic.mil>; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:01:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from [195.25.4.114] (dyn-1-1-114.Vin.dialup.oleane.fr [195.25.4.114]) by s1.smtp.oleane.net with SMTP id RAA14659; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 17:01:49 +0100 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 17:01:05 +0100 From: icsti <icsti@DIAL.OLEANE.COM> Subject: 'News for Nov 28th' Sender: ICSTI-L list <ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL> X-Sender: mo002@pop.dial.oleane.com (Unverified) Approved-by: crandall@DTIC.MIL To: ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL Reply-to: ICSTI-L list <ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL> Message-id: <v01530501b6495efc7373@[195.25.4.254]> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by list.dtic.mil id LAA04245 X-Mailer: Eudora F1.5.3 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Comments: cc: bcarroll@infointl.com, gailhodge@aol.com, kjohnson@infointl.com 1.How vulnerable are we?? Telephone companies from Singapore and Indonesia scrambled on Nov 21 to repair a break in an undersea telecommunications cable that led to major Internet traffic jams for millions of users across the globe. The SEA-ME-WE 3 cable was cut between Singapore and Jakarta. The 38,000 km (23,600 miles) cable links Australia, Asia and Europe and is one of the world's busiest Internet cables. Telstra Corp Ltd, Australia's biggest Internet provider, lost 65 percent of its international capacity. According to local reports the telephone network seized up in places because access to the Net was unavailable. Telstra posted a notice on its website warning customers of long delays due to the disruption to its "Australian backbone". Just shows how vulnerable we can become, seems strange to me that a telecom company would rely to such an extent on one channel. Maybe it is an indication of the downside of de-regulation, competition is so strong that you cannot afford to invest in 'just in case' backup facilities. 2.Thomson plans net university The London Financial Times reported on Nov 23 that Universitas 21 (U21), an international network of universities, plans a partnership with Thomson, the Canadian electronic publishing group, to set up a global online "e-university". U21, whose 18 universities cover ten countries and have a combined operating budget of $10bn, was founded in 1997. Thomson and U21 are understood to be investing tens of millions of dollars in the venture - one of the first attempts to build a large distance learning institution that can award degrees, outside the US. The joint venture plans to produce curricula and courses for the higher education field. Other e-university ventures are underway, including a £400m ($568m) project backed by the UK government which is attempting to enlist support from universities, companies and overseas partners. Members of U21 include the UK universities of Edinburgh, Birmingham, Glasgow and Nottingham; Lund in Sweden, Freiburg in Germany, Michigan in the US; McGill, British Columbia, and Toronto in Canada; plus Melbourne, New South Wales, Queensland, Auckland, Singapore, Peking and Hong Kong, employing 44,000 academics and researchers. Talks are underway to expand the network, possibly to a maximum of 25 universities, further US representation is likely. The secretariat is held at the moment by the University of Melbourne. http://www.universitas.edu.au Is this another example of the shape of things to come. If this takes off then the next phase might include access to databases and journals as part of the package, at discount rates. If there are x thousand students on the courses around the world getting discounted access what does it mean for library access to these products? 3.A strange case At this site: http://www.lisnews.com/article.php3?sid=20001126121407 I found the following: "In 1988 Henry H. Barschall did a study that found non-profit society-based journals offered work equal to or better than commercial journals, and are cheaper. Commercial publisher Gordon & Breach didn't like what was said, and filed suite. Gordon & Breach has now spent millions of dollars and eleven years pressing a false-advertising claim against two non-profit competitors" Comments are invited to the following question: Has pursuing a course of continuous litigation against both the scientific and the academic library communities hurt business for G&B's journals? I have never heard of this case, is anybody aware of it?? If so, is it serious?? Bye, Barry ********************************* Stephanie de La Rochefoucauld, Admin. ICSTI 51 boulevard de Montmorency 75016 Paris, France Tel. +33 1 45 25 65 92 Fax: +33 1 42 15 12 62 ********************************* --Boundary_(ID_QeyN2GwkObIb5+hFpYO/dA)--
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: ICANN continued
- Next by Date: [Fwd: Digital Preservation - new list]
- Prev by thread: [Fwd: Digital Preservation - new list]
- Next by thread: ICANN continued
- Index(es):