[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
ISOC News
- To: Multiple recipients of list <epc-l@iucr.org>
- Subject: ISOC News
- From: Howard Flack <Howard.Flack@cryst.unige.ch>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 17:40:01 +0100 (BST)
* ICANN Meeting -- Yokohama, Japan ICANN is taking advantage of the superlative international attendance so typical of our INET conferences. It has planned its meeting to occur just prior to the INET week at the same venue. Among the more important topics to be addressed is the addition of new gTLDs. It is not clear if any will be added, but if so, the number is expected to be very small. 5. PUBLIC POLICY By David Maher, Vice President, Public Policy, dwmaher@ibm.net In the continuing struggle to define the roles of the constituencies that make up the Domain Name Supporting Organization (DNSO) of ICANN, one of the knottiest problems is the establishment of criteria for membership in the Non- Commercial Domain Name Holders constituency. This is a constituency of which ISOC is a founding member. The other constituencies of the DNSO, such as the intellectual property, ccTLD, and registrar groups, found it relatively easy to define themselves. However, the noncommercial constituency has had a continuing problem relating to its membership, and part of the problem involves ISOC itself. A large part of ISOC's strength comes from the thriving group of local and regional chapters around the world that contribute in many ways to ISOC's activities. Early on, the question arose whether ISOC chapters could participate separately in the noncommercial constituency. The question is being raised again and will be debated at the ICANN meetings in Yokohama in July 2000. Currently, a compromise has been struck in which the chapters may join as nonvoting members. The question whether nonvoting members should (or must) contribute financially has also been raised. A related issue is the question of whether governmental organizations may join the noncommercial constituency. In the earliest stages of formation of the group, it was suggested that local organizations such as library boards might be members. Although the question never arose explicitly, it was undoubtedly assumed by all participants in the debate that major governmental entities such as nations, provinces, or states would not be members. The line dividing these groups was never drawn, and it is being debated again. Yet another issue is the question of whether political parties should be eligible to join the noncommercial constituency. One faction believes that the constituency should be the voice of those opposed to what is perceived as commercial domination of the DNSO. Others, citing the original charter of the constituency, believe that any not- for-profit, noncommercial entity engaged in "political, educational, religious, charitable, scientific [or] artistic" activities should be allowed to join. The debate will be an important part of the constituency's meetings in Yokohama and may well continue afterwards. -- Howard Flack http://www.unige.ch/crystal/ahdf/Howard.Flack.html Laboratoire de Cristallographie Phone: 41 (22) 702 62 49 24 quai Ernest-Ansermet mailto:Howard.Flack@cryst.unige.ch CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland Fax: 41 (22) 702 61 08
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: [Fwd: Fwd: CRIS2000]
- Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: ALPSP documents]
- Prev by thread: NEWS FROM INET2000 #3
- Next by thread: [Fwd: Fwd: CRIS2000]
- Index(es):