[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
[Fwd: fyi:Database Protection Bill May Come to Vote in U.S. House]
- To: Multiple recipients of list <epc-l@iucr.org>
- Subject: [Fwd: fyi:Database Protection Bill May Come to Vote in U.S. House]
- From: Howard Flack <Howard.Flack@cryst.unige.ch>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 13:47:09 GMT
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_U5bpYdhbc92fGwc8cFTDtA) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -- Howard Flack http://www.unige.ch/crystal/ahdf/Howard.Flack.html Laboratoire de Cristallographie Phone: 41 (22) 702 62 49 24 quai Ernest-Ansermet mailto:Howard.Flack@cryst.unige.ch CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland Fax: 41 (22) 702 61 08 --Boundary_(ID_U5bpYdhbc92fGwc8cFTDtA) Content-type: message/rfc822 Return-path: <owner-icsti-l@DTIC.MIL> Received: from sc2a.unige.ch ([129.194.48.4]) by sunny.unige.ch (PMDF V5.2-32 #37942) with ESMTPS id <0FPR0013CPYQZX@sunny.unige.ch> for flack@sunny.unige.ch (ORCPT rfc822;howard.flack@CRYST.UNIGE.CH); Fri, 11 Feb 2000 14:40:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from DIRECTORY-DAEMON by sc2a.unige.ch (PMDF V5.2-32 #37940) id <01JLS9KABLDS001USA@sc2a.unige.ch> for flack@sunny.unige.ch (ORCPT rfc822;howard.flack@CRYST.UNIGE.CH); Fri, 11 Feb 2000 14:40:01 +0200 (MET-DST) Received: from dtics13.dtic.mil ([131.84.1.18]) by sc2a.unige.ch (PMDF V5.2-32 #37940) with ESMTP id <01JLS9K8RI2U0024TW@sc2a.unige.ch> for howard.flack@CRYST.UNIGE.CH; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 14:40:00 +0200 (MET-DST) Received: from dtics13 (dtics13.dtic.mil [131.84.1.18]) by dtics13.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA12512; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:36:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from DTIC.MIL by DTIC.MIL (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 15487 for ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:36:50 -0500 Received: from mails.dtic.mil (mails.dtic.mil [131.84.1.19]) by dtics13.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA12450 for <icsti-l@dtics13.dtic.mil>; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:30:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from imo12.mx.aol.com (imo12.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.2]) by mails.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1/990419cac) with ESMTP id IAA19668 for <icsti-l@dtic.mil>; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:30:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from Gailhodge@aol.com by imo12.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v25.3.) id 6.4b.12611fe (3924) for <icsti-l@dtic.mil>; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:30:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:30:29 -0500 (EST) From: Gail Hodge <Gailhodge@AOL.COM> Subject: fyi:Database Protection Bill May Come to Vote in U.S. House Sender: ICSTI-L list <ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL> Approved-by: crandall@DTIC.MIL To: ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL Reply-to: ICSTI-L list <ICSTI-L@DTIC.MIL> Message-id: <4b.12611fe.25d568f5@aol.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 38 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 APOLOGIES FOR DUPLICATE POSTING. According to ALAWON (Feb. 8) the American Library Association e-newsletter, H.R. 354, the Collections of Information Antipiracy Act, could come to a vote in the U.S. House of Representatives as early as Feb. 14. This bill was not voted on in the last session which ended in October, due in part to the efforts of the library community. H.R. 354 is supported by the publishing and database communities. It defines broad prohibitions related to database usage and then carves out specific exemptions. It provides protection from all substantial copying of databases, whether the copying is for commercial or noncommercial purposes. There is no exemption for Fair Use for libraries, education, journalism or research. In 1999, the U.S. library community drafted and had proposed H.R. 1858 through the House Commerce Committee, in direct opposition to H.R. 354. This is a very narrow bill. It specifically targets the "parasitical copying of commercial databases". It permits transformative, downstream uses of data, which are considered important to the research and scientific communities. It has strong Fair Use provisions, and prohibits database producers from refusing to license their databases. However, according to James Neal, Head of the Library at Johns Hopkins Univ. and a frequent provider of Congressional testimony on these bills, H.R. 1858 does not seem to be "anywhere at this point" (personal communication - Feb. 9). ALAWON considers the passage of H.R. 354 to be "one of the top legislative priorities for the House Judiciary Committee". (These database protection bills are seen as a response to the European Database Directive which provides protection only to databases from countries that have similar legislation.) It is also apparent that the library community is once again gearing up to stop the vote. For more information see http://www.ala.org/washoff/copyright.html --Boundary_(ID_U5bpYdhbc92fGwc8cFTDtA)--
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: ICSTI meeting
- Next by Date: [Fwd: [Fwd: Recent developments] For information]
- Prev by thread: [Fwd: [Fwd: Recent developments] For information]
- Next by thread: ICSTI meeting
- Index(es):