[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: nexus
- To: Multiple recipients of list <epc-l@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: nexus
- From: Howard Flack <Howard.Flack@cryst.unige.ch>
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 14:59:34 GMT
Answers and suggestions come in reverse order: > > Do we all agree on this approach? Seems fine to me. > The mirror sites would download everything from Chester. This comment has nothing to do with Nexus but I'm starting to get slight shivers about mirror sites picking up their sources from the site with the best network connection for them. Lachlan picks up /iucr-top from www.se.iucr.org, Yves picks up /cww-top from Geneva, etc. If se starts to pick up iucr-top from za, and za from ch, and ch from se we will end up in a terrible mess. [If you wish to comment make a copy and post with a subject Mirrors] > We might also > expect that if the project really took off, individuals would be canvassing > for the inclusion of their own pages, so some sort of objective criteria for > inclusion should be drawn up. I suggest they could sponsor the production and distribution of a number of CD-ROMs for distribution in developing countries. > > The list of institutions has the same limitation: IUCr references are all > > included as well as a very limited number of crystallographic institutions. > > I do not know why other are not mentioned. For instance a reference is made > > towards the Synchrotron facility in Taiwan but not to the other ones. > > In previous correspondence, Howard has raised doubts about the suitability > of including mirrors of individual institutions (such as the Cuban > laboratories). (1) For CWW I gave up maintaining a list of pointers to individual institutions for the "big" countries for which someone else maintained such a list. In general the home list was always more up to date and more complete than my own. So in CWW I just provided a pointer to the home list. For the "small" countries I add information into cww-top/geo.index.html . I had the very strong impression that there were powerful political forces at work for the maintenance of a national list for the questions of internal funding and external prestige. (2) However in reading Brian's reply it came to my mind that lists of individual institutions are perhaps more a very useful extension to the functionalities of World Directory of Crystallographers. LDAP is hierarchical in the X500 way so it could support information at a national and regional level. Suitable information would be the name and address of the national committees of crystallography, the national crystallographic association, a list of institutions. (Post comments to this under the heading WDC.) -- Howard Flack http://www.unige.ch/crystal/ahdf/Howard.Flack.html Laboratoire de Cristallographie Phone:(+41 22) 702 62 49 24 quai Ernest-Ansermet mailto:Howard.Flack@cryst.unige.ch CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland Fax:(+41 22) 781 21 92
Reply to: [list | sender only]