[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: Towards a new version of the World Database of Crystallographers
- To: Multiple recipients of list <epc-l@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: Towards a new version of the World Database of Crystallographers
- From: Brian McMahon <bm@iucr.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 15:58:01 GMT
> Requirements add: > > - (6 + A) Unique highly-stable personal key > This is needed in hypertext documents to link into a person's > entry in WDC. This is implicit in your (11) but I mention it just to be sure. Yes. It's also to some extent implicit in the notion of loading WDC into a relational database; but you are right to emphasise the point. I've just been chatting with Pete and there are a few more points to add. As requirement (6 + B) (clever numbering scheme, eh?): - (6 + B) Provision of access and fine tuning of information stored to facilitate the identification of referees by Coeditors. It's been pointed out that we need to work carefully on the proper handling of addresses. For a database linked to the journals, authors may be associated with multiple addresses (typically there might be affiliations to more than one department or institution; and the affiliation address on the paper may no longer be current, since it represents the location where the work was done, and not necessarily the author's current abode). The journals database separates the affiliation addresses into tables that 'belong' to the paper, while there is a 'correspondence' address that belongs to the author. Pete suggests that if we present a web form to modify an address, it should carry some legend such as "N.B. Please take care when modifying this address, as it will be used by the journals office to send all future proofs and correspondence." Pete is also very hostile to a mechanism for updating entries that involves the investment of staff time at Chester. Certainly it's desirable to empower individuals to update their own entries without involving our staff, but this has got to be in a way that doesn't pose a security risk to the database as a whole. (It is possible under YARD to assign different read/write privileges to different tables.) Regards Brian
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: Re: Towards a new version of the World Database of Crystallographers
- Next by Date: Re: Towards a new version of the World Database of Crystallographers
- Prev by thread: Re: Towards a new version of the World Database of Crystallographers
- Next by thread: Re: Towards a new version of the World Database of Crystallographers
- Index(es):