[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Krakow2001 and further actions
- To: Multiple recipients of list <ecacomsig@iucr.org>
- Subject: Krakow2001 and further actions
- From: Alexandre Urzhumtsev/Ourjoumtsev <sacha@lcm3b.uhp-nancy.fr>
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 16:10:56 GMT
Deal All ! many thanks for David for expressing his warries. >Some one with absolute authority MUST allocate to Ton (as Chirman of comsig) >the number of microsymposia sessions he wants AND THEN LET HIM organise the >chairs, speakers and topics with people he chooses. Ton is a good listener >and a careful thinker. He will be able to select a good program which will >satisfy small and large structure interests. Macromolecular interests are >strongly represented in comsig - a balanced show can be put on. If the >macromolecular people want to do something in addition to the comsig >sessions, that is another issue easily resolved by additional symposia. > > David Watkin In fact, I do not think there is anything contradicting to David's idea. Ton is collecting very carefully opinions of every of us and it is HIS LAST WORD and HIS DEFINITE DECISION on any SIG action. He is doing this well; it is HIM who contact the ECA administration and the ECM-20 Committee. I do not see any wrong move. Probably, some confusing impression came from the fact that few mails came with my suggestions and recently Lecomte sent his important mail - as a ECA President (in fact, we even did not contact between us on this subject; maybe this is even wrong). Coming back to warries of macro/micro - I remind you that I insisted (and will continue to do this) from the beginning to avoid such separation. Even now, I would like that the microsymposium "New Techniques" includes more than the techniques which are new for macromolecules ONLY. One more remark where my opinion may be not in agreeement with an opinion of other SIG members (as we saw this several times). After we pushed some microsimposium relevant to Cryst.Computing and it is accepted, why should we warry TOO MUCH if people from some other SIG make a lot of efforts in its organisation (thank to them !) ? What should be important that such MS, relevant to our interests, EXISTS. Maybe, I am wrong ? I really thank David many-many times that due to his attension we have a possibility to discuss our problems and express our opinion - it is a real creation of our SIG, and not the formal decision which was done last August. I remind you that anyhow currently the ECM-20 story is on the way and we need to think about our future actions. As we discussed this, we can think about a Computer School for the next IUCr Congress (definitely, this should be done together with an Internationl Committee on Cryst. Computing !). Or something else - waiting for your suggessions. Best wishes for everybody for New Year ! Sasha
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: RE: Krakow2001
- Next by Date: Re: Krakow2001 and further actions
- Prev by thread: Computing Sessions Krakow2001
- Next by thread: Re: Krakow2001 and further actions
- Index(es):