[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Minutes of the closed COMCIFS meeting in Florence
- To: "Discussion list of the IUCr Committee for the Maintenance of the CIFStandard (COMCIFS)" <comcifs@iucr.org>
- Subject: Minutes of the closed COMCIFS meeting in Florence
- From: David Brown <idbrown@mcmaster.ca>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:31:00 -0400
Minutes of the COMCIFS closed meetings at the IUCr Congress in Florence, August 23-31, 2005. David Brown (Chair) Meeting of the Chair with the Executive Committee --------------------------------------------------------------- I met briefly with the Executive Committee and pointed out that we needed to extend our Terms of Reference beyond the current and limited purpose of 'maintaining the integrity of CIF' on behalf of the Union. The terms should also include the ability to establish standards that would allow crystallographic information in electronic form to be accessed by other related disciplines. The Executive Committee was receptive to this idea, and I will shortly circulate a proposed rewording for discussion and approval. I also pointed out that after 15 years the CIF project was at a crossroads and needed to move into new directions; I expected the meetings of COMCIFS at the present Congress would set the agenda for the next five or more years. The Executive Committee was appreciative of the work we had done and expressed its confidence in what we might propose for the future. The Executive Committee did, however, express some reservations about the lack of new and younger voting members on COMCIFS. While they appreciated that this critical juncture was not the time for a large turn-over of members, we were urged to consider bringing in new blood at the next Congress. COMCIFS Closed Meetings ----------------------------------- In addition to the COMCIFS open meeting and the microsymposium hosted by the Computing Commission and COMCIFS, which will be reported in the IUCr Newsletter, COMCIFS held two closed meetings. The following were present at one or both meetings: David Brown (as chair), Brian McMahon, Herbert Bernstein, Simon Coles, Howard Flack, Ralf Grosse-Kunstleve, Syd Hall, James Hester, Owen Johnson, Peter Murray-Rust, Nick Spadaccini, Brian Toby and John Westbrook, Following a report on my discussions with the Executive Committee, the meeting agreed with the proposal that COMCIFS should take responsibility for the maintenance of the orphaned DDL1 (Dictionary Definition Language 1). Discussion on the interoperability between CIF and XML led naturally to Syd Hall's presentation on starDDL, and in turn to a general discussion of the requirements for the next version of CIF. In brief, these include a more structured hierarchy of concepts, better linking between concepts, the introduction of vector and matrix items, the introduction of methods which would allow an item to be calculated from other items present in the CIF, and interoperability with XML while maintaining full compatibility with the existing CIF archives written using DDL1 or DDL2 dictionaries. It was however recognized that some significant investment would be needed in open source tools if the project is to be accepted by the community. While early versions of CIF could be prepared on a word processor, a factor crucial to CIF's original acceptance by the crystallographic community, the new generation of CIFs would need creation and editing tools to ensure that their more complex structure fully conformed to the new dictionaries. The second meeting opened with a review by John Westbrook of the current status of CIF in the Protein Data Bank, highlighting their requirements for any new version of CIF (e.g., XML and backward CIF compatibility). In the discussion following there was a consensus on the requirements of the next generation of CIF and that starDDL provided a suitable basis for the development of a new generation of dictionaries. These would be compatible with the current CIF archive and would add the functionality required in the future. There was also agreement that the dictionaries needed to be divided on an hierarchical principle rather than following the ad hoc arrangement that had grown up during the early development stages. Underlying this discussion was the recognition that the strength of CIF lay in its ontology. While the proposed enhancements of CIF would require that the definitive dictionaries be written in StarDDL, the ability to transfer this ontology to other platforms such as XML (e.g., CIF/XML) was seen as a priority, However, for the foreseeable future software would likely have to use a syntax based on StarDDL to exploit all the features that will be built into the new dictionaries. In order to move rapidly forward, Syd Hall, Nick Spadaccini and John Westbrook agreed to post a version of starDDL to serve as the basis for future development. Syd also agreed to provide software to transform the current dictionaries into starDDL compliant dictionaries (though warning that manual editing of these would also be necessary). David Brown and Brian McMahon agreed to work on the rearrangement of items into dictionaries that followed the hierarchy of crystallographic concepts. Protocols for the merging of dictionaries would be needed. David Brown and Brian McMahon also agreed to prepare a time-line for the development of the new standard, indicating what features (dictionaries, software, etc.) would be needed at each point, and what resources would need to be found. As we finished, John Westbrook suggested that the acronym CIF should be reinterpreted as Crystallographic Information Framework. This was given a favourable reception (as it had been in Geneva). A formal motion to effect this change will be presented to COMCIFS. I. David Brown Chair
begin:vcard fn:I.David Brown n:Brown;I.David org:McMaster University;Brockhouse Institute for Materials Research adr:;;King St. W;Hamilton;Ontario;L8S 4M1;Canada email;internet:idbrown@mcmaster.ca title:Professor Emeritus tel;work:+905 525 9140 x 24710 tel;fax:+905 521 2773 version:2.1 end:vcard
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: COMCIFS consultant
- Next by Date: Proposed COMCIFS terms of reference
- Prev by thread: Re: Proposed COMCIFS terms of reference
- Next by thread: Draft Minutes of the closed COMCIFS meetings
- Index(es):