[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: New item for the core CIF dictionary?
- To: comcifs@iucr.org
- Subject: Re: New item for the core CIF dictionary?
- From: Brian McMahon <bm@iucr.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:09:17 +0000
- In-Reply-To: <423FFC3E.3010408@rcsb.rutgers.edu>
- References: <20050321113958.GD15032@emerald.iucr.org><423FFC3E.3010408@rcsb.rutgers.edu>
Thanks John. There is in fact a distinction: the PUBL_AUTHOR category contains details for the (often) multiple authors of a publication; AUDIT_CONTACT_AUTHOR refers to a single individual responsible for updating the contents of the file. For Acta we have found that we need to keep these distinct, and (recently) that we need to store emails for each possible publication author. Cheers Brian On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 06:06:38AM -0500, John Westbrook wrote: > Hi Brian, > > In the mmCIF case, perhaps the alias should be directed to > _audit_contact_author.email if this is the intention of > the item. If not, then the change is fine. > > Regards, > John
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- New item for the core CIF dictionary? (Brian McMahon)
- Re: New item for the core CIF dictionary? (John Westbrook)
- Prev by Date: Re: CIF dictionary register dictionary
- Next by Date: Re: Items for the Agenda of the COMCIFS closed meeting
- Prev by thread: Re: New item for the core CIF dictionary?
- Next by thread: CIF dictionary register dictionary
- Index(es):