[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: COMCIFS open meeting a Florence
- To: "Discussion list of the IUCr Committee for the Maintenance of the CIFStandard (COMCIFS)" <comcifs@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: COMCIFS open meeting a Florence
- From: Howard Flack <crystal@flack.ch>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:51:19 +0200
- In-reply-to: <4119295A.6090705@mcmaster.ca>
- References: <4119295A.6090705@mcmaster.ca>
I think you have chosen a good theme. One would just need to be sure that the Committee on Crystallographic Databases has not picked up the same topic for their MS (if they are thinking of organising one.) > How can we avoid Data Frustration? If you change the title to How can we avoid Frustration? I'm sure you will multiply the attendance by 100. If you need any illustrative material, I receive copious amounts of unsolicited e-mail containing just what you need or perhaps more precisely what the people who send this stuff think that I need! > 2. Searching Across Databases > Importance of common definitions It think you need something in here about metadata and the PMH (protocol for meta-data harvesting). > 3. Taming the Data Generators: Synchrotrons and Neutrons > (Perhaps two short papers) I'm not really quite sure what you have in mind here. If I follow the general title 'Data Frustration', the sort of complaint that I hear most frequently concerns the poor quality and lack of completeness of the information in database XYZ. Amusingly these same people seem very little influenced by the style and quality of the user interface to access the information and more concerned by its quality. CIF is an enabling technology for data validation and so has much to contribute to alleviate data frustration. Another perceived aspect of data frustration is one of access and in particular open access. Somehow I don't think that CIF and COMCIFS as such is the agency of change (progress?) in the 'access' area. > 5. Interfacing with Chemistry > CML and other chemical approaches The choice of speaker is strongly influenced by the policy that the organising committee of IUCr 2005 takes with respect to invited speakers or organisers who only have an interest in attending one particular session. At a session on the internet that I organized for IUCr 1996, one of my speakers (a non-crystallographer) was local to the conference venue, only came for the morning of the microsymposium and was allowed to enter without paying any registration fee. At IUCr 2002 no matter how short a period one attended the conference, one could not get through the door without paying the full registration fee. If I mention this, it is because I think there are potential speakers on the above topic coming from the RSC (in Cambridge, UK). I see great merit in having someone from the chemical community coming along to tell us what is going on and what they expect from the crystallographers. [I think I phrased everything sufficiently carefully to be able to send this message to the list.] H.
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- CIF Infoset (Peter Murray-Rust)
- References:
- COMCIFS open meeting a Florence (David Brown)
- Prev by Date: COMCIFS open meeting a Florence
- Next by Date: CIF Infoset
- Prev by thread: COMCIFS open meeting a Florence
- Next by thread: CIF Infoset
- Index(es):