[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CIF line limits
- To: Multiple recipients of list <comcifs-l@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: CIF line limits
- From: "Brian H. Toby" <Brian.Toby@nist.gov>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 17:28:12 GMT
> Now VAXes! Those I would have guessed were dead and gone .... I'm wrong > yet again! Not wanting to appear too antiquated... We do have a Linux/VME system next to the diffractometer and ready for testing. I hope to replace the VAX/CAMAC system by the end of the year, but the VAX software has been developed over 2 decades and it will probably take another year before the Linux software can control all the various hardware that the VAX does now. On the subject of CIF line limits -- to me there is a quandry. If there is a mechanism by which >80 char lines can be converted so that files are then compliant with the current standard, is there really a need to change the standard? Is this a line continuation problem better handled with Brian's suggestion? Brian ******************************************************************** Brian H. Toby, Ph.D. Leader, Crystallography Team Brian.Toby@NIST.gov NIST Center for Neutron Research, Stop 8562 voice: 301-975-4297 National Institute of Standards & Technology FAX: 301-921-9847 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8562 http://www.ncnr.nist.gov/xtal ********************************************************************
- Prev by Date: Re: CIF line limits
- Next by Date: Re: CIF line limits
- Prev by thread: Re: CIF line limits
- Next by thread: Re: CIF line limits
- Index(es):