[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Backus-Naur Form for CIF
- To: Multiple recipients of list <comcifs-l@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: Backus-Naur Form for CIF
- From: "I. David Brown" <idbrown@mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:24:36 +0100 (BST)
Peter Murray-Rust wrote > [NB I > have never felt happy about the *semantics* of dot and query - it certainly > used to be possible to interpret them so that CIF processors were required > the to expand ? in DDLs into default values in data files.] The 'Guide to CIF for Authors' makes it clear that '?' is used when the value is not known (i.e. it may or may not be the default). '.' is interepreted as the default (if a default exists). In my understanding '.' is also used to indicate that the value is irrelevant in the current context in which case substituting the default value should not cause any problem. However, '?' should never be substituted by the default. It is not easy to find where these conventions are defined and I would recommend that they be carefully and explicitly defined on Brian's revamped website. ***************************************************** Dr.I.David Brown, Professor Emeritus Brockhouse Institute for Materials Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Tel: 1-(905)-525-9140 ext 24710 Fax: 1-(905)-521-2773 idbrown@mcmaster.ca *****************************************************
- Prev by Date: Re: Backus-Naur Form for CIF
- Next by Date: Re: Backus-Naur Form for CIF
- Prev by thread: Re: Backus-Naur Form for CIF
- Next by thread: Re: Backus-Naur Form for CIF
- Index(es):