[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Backus-Naur Form for CIF
- To: Multiple recipients of list <comcifs-l@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: Backus-Naur Form for CIF
- From: Nick Spadaccini <nick@cs.uwa.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 02:04:54 +0100 (BST)
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Herbert J. Bernstein wrote: > Sorry to be a stickler, but, even though CIF's are star files, an > implementation of star BNF is not an implementation of the proposed CIF > BNF. If we are formally proposing a CIF BNF, implementation should be > carried through to working code at least once, and preferably more than > once. Peter has made a good suggestion. Sorry, I didn't make myself absolutely clear. The STAR versions can be made into CIF compliant versions very quickly. It mainly involves the deletion of productions, and then some additional checking on record lengths etc. Nick -------------------------------- Dr Nick Spadaccini Department of Computer Science voice: +(61 8) 9380 3452 University of Western Australia fax: +(61 8) 9380 1089 Nedlands, Perth, WA 6907 email: nick@cs.uwa.edu.au AUSTRALIA web: http://www.cs.uwa.edu.au/~nick
- Prev by Date: Re: Backus-Naur Form for CIF
- Next by Date: Re: Backus-Naur Form for CIF
- Prev by thread: Re: Backus-Naur Form for CIF
- Next by thread: Re: Backus-Naur Form for CIF
- Index(es):