[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Backus-Naur Form for CIF
- To: Multiple recipients of list <comcifs-l@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: Backus-Naur Form for CIF
- From: Peter Murray-Rust <pazpmr@unix.ccc.nottingham.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:55:35 +0100 (BST)
At 18:21 30/09/00 +0100, Brian McMahon wrote: >In accordance with Herbert's suggestion, I have posted Nick's most recent >copy on the IUCr page at > http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/cif/spec/cif-bnf.html > >I shall post notice of its location and Herbert's protocol to cif-developers >and mmciftools, and via Crystallography Online "What's New". Suggestions for >other suitable places to post will be welcome. >Regards >Brian > >On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 09:54:29PM +0100, Herbert J. Bernstein wrote: > > Dear Colleagues, > > May I request some time to carefully review Nick's BNF. This is a very > > important document which will be used by many software developers. I > > would like to suggest that we follow an orderly process: > > > > 1. The document with its recent corrections should be posted to an IUCr > > page for comments and suggestions by not only the COMCIFS membership, but > > by appropriate interested technical consultants, for at least 30 days. > > > > 2. If significant changes are made, the clock should be restarted until > > a stable version has been posted for at least 30 days. > > > > 3. Then we should vote. > > > > I for one will not be able to make the necessary rigourous tests (i.e. > > using this BNF with real programs) until I am back from England in > > October. I support this requirement for testing. I believe that the IETF requires two independent implementations of a proposed protocol to show that it is workable. I have read the BNF by eye but have no comments (other than to agree it is an important document) . In principle it should be tested against: - example files (both conforming and non-conforming) - yacc-like tools. I know this is tedious - and furthermore I am not offering to do it :-( - but it is a necessary part of the process. (I hope to write more about CIF tools in general shortly). P. I think it is very important that Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK Tel: +44-(0)-115-951-5087 Fax: +44-(0)-115-951-5110 http://www.vsms.nottingham.ac.uk
- Prev by Date: Re: Revised statement of policy by IUCr on CIF and STAR
- Next by Date: Re: Survey of available CIF software and request for wish list
- Prev by thread: Re: Backus-Naur Form for CIF
- Next by thread: Re: Backus-Naur Form for CIF
- Index(es):