[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Minutes - Action item (1) merging dictionaries
- To: Multiple recipients of list <comcifs-l@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: Minutes - Action item (1) merging dictionaries
- From: Sydney R Hall <syd@crystal.uwa.edu.au>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 13:25:43 GMT
Brian and Gotzon: I suspect it would help all of us if you could each give an abbrieviated example of what you consider is needed wrt AUDIT_CONFORM usage, and why. I think that there is a real danger that some of us are making different interpretations of what is being proposed. And those of us prototyping the next generation of cif dictionaries have to be certain about what is implied by this attribute. Cheers, Syd. ------ syd@crystal.uwa.edu.au ,-_|\ Professor Sydney R. Hall / \ Director, Crystallography Centre Fx: 61(8)9380 1118 --> *_,-._/ Deputy Executive Dean of Science Ph: 61(8)9380 2725 v University of Western Australia www.crystal.uwa.edu.au Nedlands 6907, AUSTRALIA.
- Prev by Date: Re: Minutes - Action item (1) merging dictionaries
- Next by Date: Annual Comcifs report
- Prev by thread: Re: Minutes - Action item (1) merging dictionaries
- Next by thread: Re: Minutes - Action item (1) merging dictionaries
- Index(es):