[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: DDL2/mm_CIF bugs/suggestions
- Subject: Re: DDL2/mm_CIF bugs/suggestions
- From: James Hester <jrh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:33:58 +0900
- In-Reply-To: <20050719093408.GB5524@emerald.iucr.org>
- References: <1121763794.4152.26.camel@anbf10><20050719093408.GB5524@emerald.iucr.org>
Thanks Brian for the pointer to the new versions. > I'll make a formal announcement about the canonical dictionaries > later this week when I've had time to update the IUCr web pages > (all have been revised for Volume G, though in many cases the > revisions are minor rewordings of text definitions). > > If anyone is too keen to await that announcement, the CIF dictionary > register ftp://ftp.iucr.org/pub/cifdics/cifdic.register will give you > the URLs of all the latest versions. > So I'd be grateful if you would try validating mmcif_std.dic version > 2.0.09 against ddl_core_2.1.3.dic and then against mmcif_ddl_2.1.6.dic > (with apologies for the vagaries of the naming scheme). The only problems I found doing the above checks is that an item from the _item_description category is missing from all the save frames that describe categories rather than data blocks. My interpretation of the meaning of _category.mandatory_code of 'yes' for _item_description is that something from this category should always be present in a definition frame. This may be a misunderstanding on my part. These checks don't include checking category_group and sub_group items for consistency. _______________________________________________ cif-developers mailing list cif-developers@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- DDL2/mm_CIF bugs/suggestions (James Hester)
- Re: DDL2/mm_CIF bugs/suggestions (Brian McMahon)
- Prev by Date: Cif dictionary version numbers
- Next by Date: Re: Cif dictionary version numbers
- Prev by thread: Re: DDL2/mm_CIF bugs/suggestions
- Next by thread: RE: Tidying up DDL1 (last time?)
- Index(es):