[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
RE: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken
- Subject: RE: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken
- From: "Bollinger, John Clayton" <jobollin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:42:46 -0500
James Hester wrote: > There are a number of alternative resolutions to the > _atom_site_aniso_label problem - would it be useful to talk > about them here, or would doing it on the spot (if considered > necessary) in Florence be more effective? Doing it here, or at least starting the discussion here, does have the advantage of including those of us who will be unable attend the Florence meeting. Cheers, John -- John C. Bollinger, Ph.D. Indiana University Molecular Structure Center jobollin@indiana.edu _______________________________________________ cif-developers mailing list cif-developers@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: Re: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken
- Next by Date: Tidying up DDL1
- Prev by thread: RE: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken
- Next by thread: Fine-tuning CIF dictionary regexes
- Index(es):