[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken
- Subject: Re: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken
- From: richard_ball@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:28:55 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0506201352580.1008@mostaccioli.csse.uwa.edu.au>
- References: <1118992457.18478.123.camel@anbf10><Pine.LNX.4.62.0506171602410.8371@mostaccioli.csse.uwa.edu.au><1118998435.18478.173.camel@anbf10><Pine.LNX.4.62.0506201006460.1008@mostaccioli.csse.uwa.edu.au><1119244417.23197.73.camel@anbf10><Pine.LNX.4.62.0506201352580.1008@mostaccioli.csse.uwa.edu.au>
On [2005-Jun-20] Nick Spadaccini <nick@cs.uwa.edu.au> wrote: > Small molecule people tend to use one loop. Is that true? I always use two and I don't tend to see many 'foreign' cifs so my sample is too small to generalize from :-) > > At the level of CIF validation, it is that the data can be in one loop or > in two loops and they are equally valid. Hence your validator should > handle it. I would hope that would be the case. Regards, Richard -- Richard G. Ball Sr. Research Fellow Merck Research Laboratories 732-594-5341 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ cif-developers mailing list cif-developers@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- _atom_site_aniso_label is broken (James Hester)
- Re: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken (Nick Spadaccini)
- Re: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken (James Hester)
- Re: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken (Nick Spadaccini)
- Re: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken (James Hester)
- Re: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken (Nick Spadaccini)
- Prev by Date: Re: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken
- Next by Date: RE: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken
- Prev by thread: Re: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken
- Next by thread: Re: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken
- Index(es):