[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: New version (2.3) of core CIF dictionary available
- Subject: Re: New version (2.3) of core CIF dictionary available
- From: Brian McMahon <bm@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:49:07 +0100
- In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20031016123306.019ff3e8@pop.chem.gla.ac.uk>
- References: <20031004134127.GA17765@agate.iucr.org><5.2.0.9.0.20031016123306.019ff3e8@pop.chem.gla.ac.uk>
Dear Louis You make a very good point, and I am at fault for not ensuring that we are ready to handle the new data names at the IUCr. I shall try to have checkcif and printcif capable of handling them properly within a few days. In general it's easier to add new data names to CIF writers than to handle them properly in CIF readers. This list would be a useful forum for developers of CIF readers to announce when they have upgraded their software to be capable of reading new data names; developers of CIF writers could gauge when to release their new versions once such postings had reached a critical mass (or when a particular target application had declared). Of course, to honour CIF's archival aspirations, readers should also be able to handle the older data names. I agree that it is a nuisance to have established data names deprecated, especially when they cover such important information as the space-group symmetry, and we try to keep such changes to a minimum. The modifications of the symmetry terms in particular are in anticipation of a much more extended and rigorous description of crystallographic symmetry in future developments. It does not seem to me essential to implement the new data names in breathless haste - though, ideally, we should see the new names come in over a period of a few months for popular software that is undergoing regular maintenance. (I see that in the time I have taken to write this, Ton Spek has posted notification to the coredmg list that PLATON is now capable of handling both old and new names - Thanks, Ton.) Best wishes Brian On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:39:15PM +0100, Louis Farrugia wrote: > Dear Brian > > At 14:41 04/10/2003 +0100, you wrote: >> The core CIF dictionary (coreCIF) version 2.3 has been posted. >> >> Among the significant changes are the following: >> >> Two new categories, SPACE_GROUP and SPACE_GROUP_SYMOP have >> been introduced ... > > I have started to implement these changes in WinGX. However I find that > CIF's > using these new data names are rejected by the IUCr Checkcif service as > invalid because > symmetry information is missing. It would be helpful if the IUCr wishes the > community > to switch to these new names for their own checking software to recognise > them ! > > At present I am unsure whether to distribute a version of WinGX using these > new names > because many programs may be unable to read the new format CIF's. For > instance the CCDC's > excellent programs Mercury and Encifer are unable to recognise these new > names. > > Best wishes Louis _______________________________________________ cif-developers mailing list cif-developers@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- New version (2.3) of core CIF dictionary available (Brian McMahon )
- Re: New version (2.3) of core CIF dictionary available (Louis Farrugia )
- Prev by Date: Re: New version (2.3) of core CIF dictionary available
- Next by Date: Re: New version (2.3) of core CIF dictionary available
- Prev by thread: Re: New version (2.3) of core CIF dictionary available
- Next by thread: Re: New version (2.3) of core CIF dictionary available
- Index(es):