[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: CIF line folding/reassembly protocol

• Subject: RE: CIF line folding/reassembly protocol
• From: "Bollinger, John Clayton" <jobollin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 21:46:59 +0100 (BST)

Herb Bernstein wrote:
> The only problem with this proposal is a conflict with the 
> recent proposal to somehow recognize a final end-of-line 
> within all text fields.

[...]

I don't consider that a proposal or new -- I have claimed all along and
still maintain that it is the originally specified behavior.  Even
though you prefer a different interpretation, I hope you can at least
agree that the chosen one is consistent with the original specs and thus
grant it the status of a clarification.  Agreed, in any case, that the
line-folding proposal requires the specified modification to work
correctly with the chosen interpretation of text field values.

John Bollinger

--

John C. Bollinger, Ph.D.
Indiana University
Molecular Structure Center

jobollin@indiana.edu 

Reply to: [list | sender only]

• Prev by Date: Re: CIF line folding/reassembly protocol
• Next by Date: RE: CIF line folding/reassembly protocol
• Prev by thread: Re: CIF line folding/reassembly protocol
• Next by thread: RE: CIF line folding/reassembly protocol
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread