[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: CIF-DEVELOPERS digest 39
- Subject: Re: CIF-DEVELOPERS digest 39
- From: Brian Toby <brian.toby@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:57:21 +0100 (BST)
I have not been all that impressed with the "robustness" of most software that accept CIF as an allowed input format. (I have even been able to hang the Checkcif routines.) So, my opinion is that a CIF containing a loop_ terminated with stop_ has a good chance of breaking what little software we have. The same is true for []. I see no problem with reserving stop_ and [] as tokens that may be implemented in the future, but I'd rather not encourage folks to actually use them at this point. Brian Toby
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: RE: Revised draft of CIF 1.1 syntax document
- Next by Date: Re: Revised draft of CIF 1.1 syntax document
- Prev by thread: RE: CIF line folding/reassembly protocol
- Next by thread: Revised draft of CIF 1.1 syntax document
- Index(es):