[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
RE: Revision of IUCr policy statement on STAR/CIF
- Subject: RE: Revision of IUCr policy statement on STAR/CIF
- From: "Bollinger, John Clayton" <jobollin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 15:38:49 +0100 (BST)
Brian McMahon wrote: > Your response to this draft is welcome. Please note that this > has not yet > been redrafted by professional lawyers, and some tinkering > with the wording > is almost inevitable before it is formally accepted. There > are also some > details to be completed regarding the canonical URLs for finding the > specifications. > > What we would find most useful at this stage is some idea of > whether such > a statement would make it easier or more difficult for you to > commission, > write, redistribute and sell CIF software. I see that all the language from the current policy statement regarding noncommercial use and placing software in the public domain is missing from this draft. That certainly seems to be an advantage. I see two things missing, though: (1) something guaranteeing freedom to use the format itself [akin to point 1 of the current policy] and (2) language assuring that the policy will never be revised to be more restrictive. Regards, John Bollinger Indiana University Molecular Structure Center jobollin@indiana.edu
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: RE: Backus-Naur descriptions for STAR and CIF
- Next by Date: Re: Backus-Naur descriptions for STAR and CIF
- Prev by thread: Revision of IUCr policy statement on STAR/CIF
- Next by thread: Backus-Naur descriptions for STAR and CIF
- Index(es):